IANA time zone database - censorship: Difference between revisions

From annawiki
 
Line 5: Line 5:
  2014-08-09 Stephen Colebourne
  2014-08-09 Stephen Colebourne
  TO: Tobias Conradi, Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick
  TO: Tobias Conradi, Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick
...
  It is likely that the moderator will allow through any mail that is
  It is likely that the moderator will allow through any mail that is
  well-written, on-topic and not overtly negative or damaging to the
  well-written, on-topic and not overtly negative or damaging to the
Line 13: Line 14:
  2014-08-09 Tobias Conradi
  2014-08-09 Tobias Conradi
  TO: Stephen Colebourne, Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick
  TO: Stephen Colebourne, Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick
...
  All that aside, you have evidence of my first message titled "Messages
  All that aside, you have evidence of my first message titled "Messages
  not showing in IANA time zone mailing list archive", for convenience I
  not showing in IANA time zone mailing list archive", for convenience I

Latest revision as of 2014-08-11T23:49:09

2014-08-03

The Area Directors of the IETF Applications Area (relevance from RFC 6557) are: Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick

2014-08-09 Stephen Colebourne
TO: Tobias Conradi, Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick
...
It is likely that the moderator will allow through any mail that is
well-written, on-topic and not overtly negative or damaging to the
community. If well-written and on-topic mails were being rejected then
that would be a form of censorship which would be problematic. I do
not have evidence to suggest that kind of censorship is occurring.
2014-08-09 Tobias Conradi
TO: Stephen Colebourne, Barry Leiba, Pete Resnick
...
All that aside, you have evidence of my first message titled "Messages
not showing in IANA time zone mailing list archive", for convenience I
copy the text:

-----------
I emailed 2014-08-03 14:44:37 to tz@iana.org.

It is now 2014-08-04 00:03 and the message is not showing at

http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/tz/2014-August/
-----------

Which of your positive criteria does it not fulfill, which of your
negative criteria does it fulfill?

Or was it well-written and on-topic, and since it was rejected it
falls into "a form of censorship which would be problematic"?