Wikimedia User Tobias Conradi about User William Allen Simpson
COPY of source code from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tobias_Conradi/User:William_Allen_Simpson
- 2005-11-15 William starts registered editing [1]
- 2005-12-06/07 William's starts editing Wikipedia:Naming conventions (subnational entities) [2]
- 2005-12-08 20:07 [3]
- William removed my corrections regarding the offical names. I am not sure why he labeled my comments as silly.
- 2005-12-08 23:55 [4] his first message to my talk page
- 2005-12-09 00:10 a statement by me [5]
- telling lies within a proposal is unfair represantation is unfair representation is unfair representation
- 2005-12-09 12:07 [6] his second message to my talk page
- William: -- Vandalism on Naming conventions (subnational entities) -- Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.<(!)-- Test2 (second level warning) --> -- Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. <(!)-- Test3 (Third level warning) -->
- 2005-12-09 12:49 [7]
- William: I have only recently discovered that Tobias Conradi is on a jihad to make every country's entries conform to his one-size-fits-all uniform template.
- I don't know which template he refers to
- 14:11 I asked whether William is a sock puppet because he is quite new and already very agressive [8]
- William: I have only recently discovered that Tobias Conradi is on a jihad to make every country's entries conform to his one-size-fits-all uniform template.
- 2005-12-14 William starts RfC about me [9] - I have never seen so much nonsense and wrong stuff written about me in one page
- bot use, because I edit so fast
- 250 pages deleted by admins - (I suggested them for deletion)
- accused me of using sockpuppets - IIRC I didn't accuse him
- edits the page with a flurry of a dozen or so minor edits, so that it is very difficult to find only the subtle inaccuracies that have been introduced to somebody else's text. - which inaccuracies did I insert? I don't see how little edits in a row a more difficult to track than one big edit
- 2006-04-04 [10]
- William: Some German speaker with poor English skills has corrupted the correct "Administrative Divisions" into "Subdivisions"
- (corrupted?)
- .... was Tobias Conradi that renamed all the categories
- (which all the categories did I rename? )
- William: Some German speaker with poor English skills has corrupted the correct "Administrative Divisions" into "Subdivisions"
- 2006-04-11 09:18 [11]
- William: Yesterday, Conradi just moved and renamed dozens of pages to conform to his newly made-up term "Country subdivisions", that he found in one ISO document.
- (moved AND renamed dozens of pages? which? Williams words his newly made up term contradicts with found in one ISO document.)
- William: Heck, he renamed his own Template:Tl, that he's been sticking onto everything.
- (rename? own? onto everything? ) my reply [12] and no response by William
- William: Yesterday, Conradi just moved and renamed dozens of pages to conform to his newly made-up term "Country subdivisions", that he found in one ISO document.
- 2006-04-11 15:24 [13]
- Category:Former country subdivisions Delete -- WP:POINT creation by Tobias Conradi to illustrate his contention of category renaming for Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 4. The term is non-standard, having one badly translated reference in one document. The category itself is not notable, as these few articles are already categorized in their respective countries.
- (WP:POINT? non-standard? badly translated reference? which reference was translated? actually the non-standard term it is mentioned in ISO [International Organization for Standardization] )
- Category:Former country subdivisions Delete -- WP:POINT creation by Tobias Conradi to illustrate his contention of category renaming for Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 April 4. The term is non-standard, having one badly translated reference in one document. The category itself is not notable, as these few articles are already categorized in their respective countries.
- 2006-04-12 23:45 [14]
- William: The closer was confused by Conradi's voluminous objections. An actual count shows a clear consensus. As long as a few disruptive influences such as Conradi can override more knowledgable folks, there will never be "consensus".
- closer User:TexasAndroid was confused? my reply: [15]
- as of 2006-04-22 no evidence has been brought by William, but I counted the following:
- counted on 2006-04-22: Subdivisions to Administrative divisions: 3 support, 3 oppose
- counted on 2006-04-22 Subdivisions to Political divisions: 1 support (P.d.), 4 prefer A.d., 3 oppose.
- as of 2006-04-22 no evidence has been brought by William, but I counted the following:
- closer User:TexasAndroid was confused? my reply: [15]
- William: The closer was confused by Conradi's voluminous objections. An actual count shows a clear consensus. As long as a few disruptive influences such as Conradi can override more knowledgable folks, there will never be "consensus".
- 2006-04-16 17:12 [16]
- William: Rebuttal -- I take great offense at the denigration by Conradi, and use of diminuative name calling.
- denigration? what is William referring to?
- William: Due to his obvious ignorance of Scottish history, he probably has no idea of the offensiveness of his words....
- I am not aware of an "obvious ignorance of Scottish history" by me, so at least to me this is not obvious.
- William: Conradi obfuscated the clear results of the previous CfD by putting the following notice on several talk pages of these persons....
- obfuscate the clear results by telling people what went on? All people that I notified were involved in country subdivision matters, some being part of the project, the project that William (on purpose?) did ignore when placing the CfD.
- William: Rebuttal -- I take great offense at the denigration by Conradi, and use of diminuative name calling.
- 2006-04-18 01:34 [17]
- William: as I have elsewhere, I object to the abusive namecalling, and derogatory diminuative form of my name. Since Conradi has persisted, I will again initiate separate proceedings against him. Please ignore his ill-informed diatribe.
- abusive name calling? ill-informed diatribe? what is he talking about?
- William: as I have elsewhere, I object to the abusive namecalling, and derogatory diminuative form of my name. Since Conradi has persisted, I will again initiate separate proceedings against him. Please ignore his ill-informed diatribe.
- 2006-04-20 04:44 [18]
- William: Since we've already been though this with Conradi for two RfCs and MedCab, I'm planning on filing with ArbComm, probably this weekend (when I have more time). If you'll wait a bit, I'll be happy to notify you
- two RfCs? "We have been through this"? Who is we? One RfC was filed by William alone, IIRC Golbez withdrew his signature.
- William: Since we've already been though this with Conradi for two RfCs and MedCab, I'm planning on filing with ArbComm, probably this weekend (when I have more time). If you'll wait a bit, I'll be happy to notify you