International Latin Alphabet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Slavic== | ==Slavic== | ||
*interslav: "bogatši" which means "richer". t and š need to be pronounced separately, otherwise it would be written "bogači", which is a different word and is the singular locative of "bogač", which means "rich man" - ULA would have /bogatci/ for both and cannot distinguish. | *interslav: "bogatši" which means "richer". t and š need to be pronounced separately, otherwise it would be written "bogači", which is a different word and is the singular locative of "bogač", which means "rich man" - ULA would have /bogatci/ for both and cannot distinguish. | ||
*Polish | |||
** tc <czy> VS <trzy> | |||
** dq | |||
*** <dżem> = "jam", with monophonemic affricate, versus | |||
*** <drzem> = "take a nap (imperative)" with plosive-plus-fricative sequence. |
Revision as of 2017-05-24T00:33:35
Part of the Unified Alphabet System.
System | Comment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IPA | a | b | ʃ | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | ʒ | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z | ç | q | |
UAS-diacritic | ^ | ´ | . | ˚ | ˇ | ` | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unified Latin Alphabet 1994 | a | b | q | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | y | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | - | z | c | - | |
Unified Latin Alphabet 2015 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | y | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | - | z | q | - | |
Unified Latin Alphabet 2016 | a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | i | j | k | l | m | n | o | p | q | r | s | t | u | v | w | x | y | z | - | - |
Two constraints, a replacement value (for IPA) must be
- represented by a grapheme that is not a single Basic Latin letter (= a phone that is represented by a Basic Latin letter in IPA should only be assigned to the same letter in the alphabet)
- from the same of the two classes consonant and vowel, as the replaced value
Slavic
- interslav: "bogatši" which means "richer". t and š need to be pronounced separately, otherwise it would be written "bogači", which is a different word and is the singular locative of "bogač", which means "rich man" - ULA would have /bogatci/ for both and cannot distinguish.
- Polish
- tc <czy> VS <trzy>
- dq
- <dżem> = "jam", with monophonemic affricate, versus
- <drzem> = "take a nap (imperative)" with plosive-plus-fricative sequence.