Secession of Kosovo - Revision history

Tobiasco at 2014-04-23T16:55:35

2014-04-23T16:55:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 2014-04-23T16:55:35
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo		"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo
	adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”		adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”
	==~~Testimonies~~==		==ICTY testimonies==
	2004-12-01 http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/trans/en/041201IT.htm		===2004-12-01===
			http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/trans/en/041201IT.htm
	* Page 33993: "The 1974 constitution gave the province practically all of the functions which the republics had. Not all of them but practically all of them in the Yugoslavia at the time."		* Page 33993: "The 1974 constitution gave the province practically all of the functions which the republics had. Not all of them but practically all of them in the Yugoslavia at the time."
	* Page 33995: "The constitution of 1974 practically denied Serbia all rights in Kosovo. The province became practically equal to the republic, both the province of Kosovo and the province of Vojvodina. There were only two differences: One was that the constitution in Serbia had Article 300, making for some singular or united solutions for the whole of the republic; and the second was that the Council of States and Republics had 12 delegates while the number of deputies from the provinces were eight. This was a symbolic difference in the numbers, but the rights that these delegations had were absolutely the same, both in the federal Chamber, there were 30 and 20 deputies."		* Page 33995: "The constitution of 1974 practically denied Serbia all rights in Kosovo. The province became practically equal to the republic, both the province of Kosovo and the province of Vojvodina. There were only two differences: One was that the constitution in Serbia had Article 300, making for some singular or united solutions for the whole of the republic; and the second was that the Council of States and Republics had 12 delegates while the number of deputies from the provinces were eight. This was a symbolic difference in the numbers, but the rights that these delegations had were absolutely the same, both in the federal Chamber, there were 30 and 20 deputies."

Tobiasco: /* Testimonies */

2014-04-23T16:54:14Z

Testimonies

← Older revision		Revision as of 2014-04-23T16:54:14
Line 20:		Line 20:
	23 different forms of pressures going in this direction.		23 different forms of pressures going in this direction.

	* Page 33996		* Page 33996, moving out of non-Albanians
	18 This started from the early 1960s and became more intense after		18 This started from the early 1960s and became more intense after
	19 1968, and then increased even more after 1971. First of all, this		19 1968, and then increased even more after 1971. First of all, this

Tobiasco: /* Testimonies */

2014-04-23T16:53:39Z

Testimonies

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
   adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”
 ==Testimonies==
-*2004-12-01
+-12-01 http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/trans/en/041201IT.htm
-** http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/trans/en/041201IT.htm Page 33993: "The 1974 constitution gave the province practically all of the functions which the republics had. Not all of them but practically all of them in the Yugoslavia at the time."
+* Page 33993: "The 1974 constitution gave the province practically all of the functions which the republics had. Not all of them but practically all of them in the Yugoslavia at the time."
-** Page 33995: "The constitution of 1974 practically denied Serbia all rights in Kosovo. The province became practically equal to the republic, both the province of Kosovo and the province of Vojvodina. There were only two differences: One was that the constitution in Serbia had Article 300, making for some singular or united solutions for the whole of the republic; and the second was that the Council of States and Republics had 12 delegates while the number of deputies from the provinces were eight. This was a symbolic difference in the numbers, but the rights that these delegations had were absolutely the same, both in the federal Chamber, there were 30 and 20 deputies."
+* Page 33995: "The constitution of 1974 practically denied Serbia all rights in Kosovo. The province became practically equal to the republic, both the province of Kosovo and the province of Vojvodina. There were only two differences: One was that the constitution in Serbia had Article 300, making for some singular or united solutions for the whole of the republic; and the second was that the Council of States and Republics had 12 delegates while the number of deputies from the provinces were eight. This was a symbolic difference in the numbers, but the rights that these delegations had were absolutely the same, both in the federal Chamber, there were 30 and 20 deputies."
-** Page 34006: "For instance, the citizenship of the Republic of Serbia, because there was no citizenship of the province; right?" - "Right." ... "They wanted to demonstrate that the province was practically a republic. They wanted to put a mark of equality between the province and the republic." ... province wants to grant citizenship to immigrants coming from Albania.
+* Pressure on non-Albanians:
-** Page 34013: "What they wanted was secession from Serbia. They wanted Kosovo to become a republic."
+Q. Thank you, Mr. Jokanovic. At that time, and now we're talking
-** Page 34043: "Mr. Jokanovic, for the Assembly of Serbia to be able to pass these amendments, it was necessary to receive the approval of both provinces; is that so?" - "Yes." - "Was it necessary to have the approval of the Republic of Serbia for provincial assemblies to pass amendments?" - "No. Serbia's approval was not necessary. Provinces could change their constitutions independently."
+about the period after 1968, 1974, when all of these rights were changed,
 ==See also==
 * [[Comparing secession of Kosovo and Crimea]]

Tobiasco at 2014-04-23T16:43:44

2014-04-23T16:43:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 2014-04-23T16:43:44
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo		"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo
	adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”		adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”
			==Testimonies==
			*2004-12-01
			** http://www.icty.org/x/cases/slobodan_milosevic/trans/en/041201IT.htm Page 33993: "The 1974 constitution gave the province practically all of the functions which the republics had. Not all of them but practically all of them in the Yugoslavia at the time."
			** Page 33995: "The constitution of 1974 practically denied Serbia all rights in Kosovo. The province became practically equal to the republic, both the province of Kosovo and the province of Vojvodina. There were only two differences: One was that the constitution in Serbia had Article 300, making for some singular or united solutions for the whole of the republic; and the second was that the Council of States and Republics had 12 delegates while the number of deputies from the provinces were eight. This was a symbolic difference in the numbers, but the rights that these delegations had were absolutely the same, both in the federal Chamber, there were 30 and 20 deputies."
			** Page 34006: "For instance, the citizenship of the Republic of Serbia, because there was no citizenship of the province; right?" - "Right." ... "They wanted to demonstrate that the province was practically a republic. They wanted to put a mark of equality between the province and the republic." ... province wants to grant citizenship to immigrants coming from Albania.
			** Page 34013: "What they wanted was secession from Serbia. They wanted Kosovo to become a republic."
			** Page 34043: "Mr. Jokanovic, for the Assembly of Serbia to be able to pass these amendments, it was necessary to receive the approval of both provinces; is that so?" - "Yes." - "Was it necessary to have the approval of the Republic of Serbia for provincial assemblies to pass amendments?" - "No. Serbia's approval was not necessary. Provinces could change their constitutions independently."
	==See also==		==See also==
	* [[Comparing secession of Kosovo and Crimea]]		* [[Comparing secession of Kosovo and Crimea]]

Tobiasco at 2014-04-22T17:21:13

2014-04-22T17:21:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 2014-04-22T17:21:13
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo		"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo
	adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”		adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”

			==See also==
			* [[Comparing secession of Kosovo and Crimea]]

Tobiasco: Created page with "http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/16012.pdf#view=FitH&pagemode=none&search=%22kosovo%22 "Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo adopted on 1..."

2014-04-22T17:20:19Z

Created page with "http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/16012.pdf#view=FitH&pagemode=none&search=%22kosovo%22 "Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo adopted on 1..."

New page

http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/141/16012.pdf#view=FitH&pagemode=none&search=%22kosovo%22

"Is of the opinion that the declaration of independence of Kosovo
adopted on 17 February 2008 did not violate international law.”